Their only verification is whether or not one can speak felicitously about them. The discussion in part III is unpredictably weak.
The chapters are not uninteresting, but hard to see how they fit into the larger scheme of the book. Having said that, the takeaway for a theory of religion is promising. In part II, freed from modern systems of bifurcation, we network with beings beings of fiction and phantasy, invisible beings with whom we never ceased interacting p. Latour wants to get at their real existence as mediated and made manifest through technologies and artificial arrangements such as ritual and myth pp. Against reducing them to language and symbols, Latour thinks they have a real existence which is non-material, non-linguistic, and non-social pp.
To be sure, their mode of persistence is not the same as the one enjoyed or suffered by tables and other kinds of objects p. Their relation to the world is more tenuous and untethered. Like anything else but even more so, this mode of existence is one in which beings appear and disappear. Moving past post-structuralist theory, the real action of the book is to rethink hoary binaries between subject and object, the rejection of fixed and autonomous domains, the emphasis on associational thinking, the interlinking of art-religion-science-politics based primarily on figures and figuration, the complete opposition to biological and psychological reductionism with which to explain away peculiar psychic states of awareness, the non-substantive notion as to what counts as natural or as matter, the understanding of habit, the obsession with technical and technological mediation spanning science and religion, the very taking seriously the reality of different modes of being and how they cross over one into another.
You are commenting using your WordPress.
You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Latour wants to be able to clear up conflicts between the values that shape distinct fields between science and, perhaps, social studies of science, for example? These conflicts arise, he seems to suppose, because truth-and-falsity-talk in one realm e.
Eagleton has always had a rather good way of mobilizing this idea. Whether or not you would like to hear more about the personal qualities required in speaking the truth, as a first person practice of ethical truth-telling, which this notion of veridiction perhaps brings to mind depends perhaps on whether you think Foucault is a more profound thinker about the limits of the human than Latour. Modes of existence are presented as having forms of truth and falsity proper to them, a recurrent line in the book. Although nor, it seems, is Latour. Latour does not give much attention to the possibility that the reference to Ryle might give the impression of a certain sort of prescriptive intent behind his project.
The idea that modes of existence can be identified by their distinctive felicity and infelicity conditions recurs throughout the book. Now, it seems to me, that this reference to Austin, and speech act theory, and to felicity and infelicity conditions deserves to be treated seriously.
- Different Modes Existence by Souriau Etienne?
- Modes of Existence.
- Projective Planes;
- The Elephant to Hollywood?
- How to Knock Over a 7-Eleven and Other Ministry Training;
- The Strange History of Bonnie and Clyde!
- The Cerebral Circulation!
Being able to tell whether an action was an accident or a mistake, whether it needed to be excused or justified — these were the sorts of things that Austin worried away at. One reason to make the link is because it helps to see what Austin might have been concerned with in developing, first, and most famously, the distinction between performative and constatives and, then, junking it and replacing it with a more complex conceptual framework of locutionary acts, perlocutionary acts, and illocutionary acts.
There is something else going on. What Latour does not acknowledge , shall we say, at least not in this analysis, is the degree to which Austin might not be concerned with pluralizing orders of truth and falsity at all, but with thinking of forms accountability and evaluation of judgement that are not restricted to truth and falsity.
That, one might suppose, is precisely why Austin talked about infelicities — he was interested in various forms through which things went astray, or turned out well, or came off as intended, or ended unhappily. Another way of putting this is that Austin was interested in the faculty of judgment , and did not reduce this to a matter of assessing truth and falsity, however contextual ones understanding of those terms.
Knowing how to speak well to others might well involve being able to tell when there is more than truth or falsity at stake; so might knowing when not to feel obliged to do so at all. What an odd worry to have, to think that one needs to take a tradition of analysis beyond language? What sort of prejudice is it that still requires you to present a concern with matters of language as requiring this sort of aggrandizing correction? This line makes me ask what would it mean to ontologize Austin, specifically?
Would that be an error, or a mistake?
Étienne Souriau, The Different Modes of Existence – The Political Theology of Bruno Latour
Would it be excusable? And does it matter that those questions might sound different in other natural languages? Discover and read free books by indie authors as well as tons of classic books. Erik Beranek. Tim Howles.
Services on Demand
Isabelle Stengers. Bruno Latour Book Description: There are indeed different manners of existing and even different degrees or intensities of existence: from pure phenomena to objectivized things, by way of the virtual and the super-existent, to which works. ISBN: Add this book to a list. You can add this book to any one of your lists.
In this Book
It is also a systematic, comprehensive ontology. Philosophers are concerned with different senses in which we attribute characteristics to a number of things; or, to speak of this matter grammatically, they are concerned with the different ways in which we apply a predicate to two or more subjects.
Univocal language. Many people start from the assumption that talk about God is univocal. To use a word univocally is to use it with the same meaning. Yet we say God is love, not just God is loving. A univocal word yields a contradiction i. Position of the problem The intensive modes of existence The specific modes of existence Series Title: Univocal.
This is the approach of St. Thomas Aquinas The Different Modes of Existence. Watch TV shows and movies anytime, anywhere. Start your free month. Google Scholar. Minneapolis: Univocal Publishing. Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. Traditional Logic I Chap. Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author. Are you an author?. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, Project MUSE.